The Hokie Pokie
So while I was doing the hokie pokie in the shower (washing off my legs without actually getting in), I decided to write a new blog. I should be studying for a test I have tomorrow, but the night is young, and I have plenty of time for that nonsense. We played a soccer game tonight. We started with seven players out of nine and went behind by two goals. Two other guys showed up, so we had the full amount. We scored our first goal and then another one. A little after our second goal we asked the ref how much time was left. He replied, "One minute." Shortly thereafter I scored a goal to win the game. I won't talk about how the floor we played is the nerdiest floor on the whole campus. They were good...maybe.
Anyway tonight in our devo, we talked about how it is unnecessary to be circumcised and how Paul says that if we circumcise ourselves we are putting our faith into the law and not into the God. We would have "fallen away from grace." So essentially we are not bound by the law anymore, but bound by the Holy Spirit (Romans 7:6). So does that mean we can go against the law if the Spirit commands it? That is the question I asked to spark some conversation and we had a ball trying to answer it. You're probably saying no, you can't go against the law. Then if we can't then we should be circumcised right? But, Paul directly says that is unnecessary. I read this afterwards and it directly talks about the law. In the same Romans passage, Paul writes how the law is good, righteous, and spiritual. So we obviously cannot go against it. Point for you. But he still says we should not be circumcised. Point for me. How bout I throw this in there. What if not being circumcised is not against the law, it is just not for it? Yay! We all win! It's a thinker. Post your ideas if you want. I do not think you have to have a profile to do it.
-Brennen

